On November 20–21, I had the honour of being Chairman at the Sterile Manufacturing Dialogue in Old Windsor, England. Despite a very foggy Sunday night and concern that European speakers and delegates would be delayed (many were forced to land at Gatwick airport rather than Heathrow), a healthy turn out early on Monday morning proved the worries to be unfounded.

After I kick-started the conference with a few choice words, notably the idea that many of those present would be unlikely to let me into their kitchens, let alone their sterile manufacturing facilities, the main event began. Read more »

As the unemployment rate hovers around 9.1%, the federal government needs to find ways to create jobs. Congress is debating whether a tax break on repatriated money would prompt companies to hire more workers, as I mentioned last week. Meanwhile, the Obama administration is eyeing another potential means of stimulating job growth: investing in biological research. Read more »

Concern about pharmaceuticals in our water supply has been in the public consciousness for a few years now. In 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency found traces of various drugs in fish caught in rivers that receive effluent from wastewater-treatment plants. The drugs were believed to come from doses that people had excreted or flushed down the toilet. In response, FDA updated its guidelines for disposing of drugs. New research, however, shows another potential source of drugs in our waterways. Read more »

It’s not hard to find employees at large- or small-molecule drug companies who have gripes about FDA. On and off the record, people have complained that the agency’s review process is slow and that its decisions can be erratic. Perhaps hoping to make a positive contribution to this discussion, the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) made several proposals last week for improving FDA’s operations. Read more »

Big Pharma has offered many explanations for its anemic pipelines. All of the easy drugs have been discovered. Patent law (or another particular form of regulation) stifles innovation. The economy is forcing us to retrench. Although these explanations may be plausible, they all lay the blame elsewhere. Could Big Pharma’s own actions be discouraging research and development (R&D)? Read more »

Pharmaceutical companies can no longer take strong growth for granted, and CEOs and shareholders are lowering their expectations about future performance. The industry’s global sales growth likely will be limited to 1.3% until 2015, according to Joe Dixon, a spokesperson for Datamonitor. Compare this anemic figure to the 7.1% growth rate that manufacturers enjoyed from 2003 to 2009, and you’ll see little reason for joy in drugville. Read more »

Last week’s McDonalds glassware recall is another example of the problem of heavy metals appearing in consumer products. The fast-food giant, in cooperation with the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), recalled its promotional Shrek glassware because of the elevated level of cadmium found in the glasses. Read more »

Spring is in the air, and it’s time for a trip to the Javits Center for the annual INTERPHEX conference and exhibition. The editors of Pharmaceutical Technology and BioPharm International have arranged a series of interviews during the conference. We’ll be talking to pharmaceutical professionals, information-technology experts, and regulators about current challenges in manufacturing and about what the future might bring. Read more »

One week after President Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (HR 3590), the sweeping healthcare reform legislation into law (Public Law No. 111-148), it is still an important task to evaluate the impact of the new law on the pharmaceutical industry. Last week we reported and commented on some of those implications, and this week we continue our analysis: provisions in the new legislation regarding comparative effectiveness research (CER) and the underlying shift to value-based healthcare. Read more »

Got a Form 483? Then you’ve got 15 days. Starting today, FDA will enforce its program that calls for a more timely review of its Form 483 Inspectional Observations. Under this program, a company has 15 days to respond to the observations cited in the agency’s Form 483, before the agency decides whether to issue an official warning letter. The goal of this program is to optimize FDA’s already strained resources and to move firms to promptly correct noted violations. Read more »