Archive for the 'Products' Category

Court Ruling Threatens Drug Shortage Remedy

The Food and Drug Administration may no longer be able to alleviate shortages in vital drugs by permitting the import of unapproved medicines following a decision by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The ruling of July 23, 2013 also raises broader questions about when and how FDA can “exercise regulatory discretion” in deciding certain policy and enforcement issues.

According to a unanimous decision by a three-judge panel, FDA’s action to permit import of thiopental from an unregistered foreign establishment was “not in accordance with law,” even though the aim was to address the shortage of a needed medicine. The ruling in Cook et al v. FDA (case No. 12-5176), which upholds a previous decision by a federal district court, involves a shortage of thiopental sodium, which created serious problems for state law enforcement officials seeking to use it in delivering lethal injections. A group of death row inmates from three states filed suit, claiming that FDA violated the law by improperly allowing shipments of a misbranded and unapproved new drug to enter the United States..

The Appeals Court specifically rejected FDA’s argument that it can legally address drug shortages by permitting the import of drugs approved by other regulatory authorities. Among its various tools for combating serious short supply situations, FDA also cites authority to allow distribution of a product suffering from quality problems, but found by the agency to “not cause undue risk to patients.” Other FDA relief strategies are to work with sponsors to resolve manufacturing issues, expedite inspections and reviews of short supply products, identify additional manufacturers willing to initiate or increase production, extend product expiration dates, and help firms qualify new sources of raw materials.

FDA has permitted unapproved imports 17 times in recent years, according to its announcement in May on authorizing the import of injectable total parenteral nutrition (TPN) solutions. These products are desperately needed by hospitals to treat premature infants who are unable to eat or drink, as well as cancer patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries. In this case, FDA authorized Fresenius Kabi USA to import TPN products from its Norway plant. The agency took this step after American Regent/Luitpold shut down operations at the end of 2012 to address quality issues that left particulate matter in injectable products. In this and other cases, FDA says that it evaluates the overseas drug to ensure that it is of adequate quality and informs doctors of the status of the imported product.

The July Appeals court ruling is regarded as a victory for death penalty opponents, who had pressured other manufacturers to discontinue production of thiopental and other “death drugs.” Yet state officials had urged FDA to appeal last year’s district court ruling in order to obtain needed supplies to carry out executions according to law. In that earlier lower decision, the judge accused FDA of hypocrisy, pointing out that the agency prevents consumers from purchasing medicines over the Internet because it deems the products misbranded and unapproved. The Appeals Court agreed, noting that FDA can address specific shortages through other strategies, such as designating an unapproved foreign drug as investigational to allow its importation.

This legal challenge to FDA use of enforcement discretion also could provide support for K-V Pharmaceuticals, which is challenging FDA’s failure to block competitors from producing the pre-term birth drug Makena (hydroxyprogesterone caproate injection). In this case, explains attorney Kurt Karst of Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, the D.C. District Court has sided with FDA, stating that the agency has the right to refuse to take action to stop pharmacy compounding of the drug. Kurt speculates in the FDA Law Blog that the recent Cook case will have a “huge effect” on how it deals with drug shortages [see www.fdalawblog.net July 23, 2013].

Merck Settles in Missouri Class-Action Lawsuit

Last week, Merck agreed to settle a Missouri consumer class-action suit, which claimed the company violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act when it promoted and sold its pain reliever Vioxx. Merck removed Vioxx from shelves in 2004 due to evidence that it increased the risk of heart attacks.  According to the Justice Department, Merck began marketing Vioxx as a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis shortly after being approved by FDA as a painkiller in May 1999. However, FDA had not approved it for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis until 2002. The settlement is reportedly for $220 million and Merck agreed to pay validated claims as well as approved attorneys’ fees, and settlement notice costs.

Merck’s press release on the settlement didn’t mention any admission of wrongdoing. In a company press release, Bruce N. Kuhlik, Merck’s executive vice-president and general counsel, said “This agreement is in the best interest of the company and its shareholders. It reduces the uncertainty of litigation and ongoing defense costs, and helps us to remain focused on bringing forward innovative products and services for our customers.” This is one of several recent examples of off-label drug promotion. Are the millions pharma companies end up paying in lawsuit payouts worth sidestepping FDA rules?

CMC Troubles? Send Us Your Questions

Pharmaceutical Technology and Patheon are partnering to provide you—our readers—with CMC advice from some of the leading formulation scientists and pharmaceutical manufacturing experts in the world. To get started, we need to know what plagues your CMC strategies and daily work. Email your questions directly to Editorial Director Angie Drakulich at adrakulich@advanstar.com. (*Note: We will keep your name and company affiliation anonymous.)

Answers will be provided by the Patheon Certified Consultants team beginning in the January 2013 print and online editions of PharmTech. These experts have collectively brought more than 200 pharmaceutical products to market, including some of the world’s largest blockbusters.

Sample questions:

• I have a BCS Class II compound for which amorphous solubility is easily sustained, but I can’t get the compound to rapidly dissolve. What are some solutions, particularly with respect to excipient selection?
• I have a compound that is non-ionizable and does not form a stable salt. Are co-crystals my best option and what are the key criteria in identifying a suitable co-crystal?
• I am having trouble maintaining product stability when scaling up a lyophilization process. What are the likely factors causing the problem?

The Year of the Diet Pill

Amy RitterNew drug approvals sometimes come in class-specific clusters, as drug makers competing for the same indication race to get to market first. Read more »

Limited Enforcement

Amy RitterThis week, KV Pharmaceuticals filed a lawsuit against FDA to force the agency to stop compounded versions of their synthetic progesterone drug, Makena (hydroxyprogesterone caproate), from being produced. Read more »

Abbott Requests Indefinite Protection from Biosimilars Competition

Amy RitterAbbott Laboratories submitted a Citizen’s Petition to FDA, requesting that the agency not consider any applications for biosimilar versions of its monoclonal antibody therapeutic, Humira. Read more »

Crisis Averted, But No Long-Term Fix

Amy RitterA critical drug that has experienced shortages is Genzyme’s, Fabrazyme (agalsidase beta), the only enzyme replacement therapy approved in the US for Fabry disease. The drug was originally produced at the company’s Allston, Massachusetts plant. The Allston plant was plagued with quality problems, which resulted in a consent decree, temporary closure of the plant in 2010, and rejection of some lots of Fabrazyme for quality reasons. In January of 2012, FDA granted approval for Genzyme to start producing Fabrazyme at its Framingham, Massachusetts plant, bringing to an end a shortage that left patients without an adequate supply of medication for nearly two years. Read more »

FDA and Roche Warn of Counterfeit Avastin

Amy RitterFDA and Genentech, a member of the Roche Group, have issued warnings about counterfeit versions of the injectable cancer drug, Avastin, circulating in the US. According to the FDA safety alert,  the counterfeit version of Avastin does not contain the medicine’s active ingredient, bevacizumab, which may have resulted in patients not receiving needed therapy. FDA issued letters to 19 medical practices that purchased unapproved cancer medications from Quality Specialty Products (QSP), a foreign supplier that may also be known as Montana Health Care Solutions. Volunteer Distribution in Gainesboro, Tennessee is a distributor of QSP’s products. Read more »

Lipitor Reaches the Patent Cliff

Amy RitterOn Nov. 30, 2011, the patent for Lipitor, the cholesterol-lowering drug that defined the term “blockbuster,” expired. Over its lifetime, it is estimated that Lipitor generated over $100 billion in sales for its parent company, Pfizer, since its introduction in 1997. Read more »

Better Quality Could Mean Fewer Drug Shortages

Erik Greb PharmTech editor

Drug shortages are an acute problem that keeps getting worse. Last year, about 211 drugs were in short supply, which was a new record. This year, the number of new drug shortages already has reached 213, according to the University of Utah Drug Information Service. As a result, many patients now have limited access to crucial drugs, such as cancer therapies and medicines for potentially lethal infections. And a Congressional committee is now investigating what appears to be an insult added to this injury. Read more »

Next Page »