<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Lawsuits Threaten Vaccine Makers’ Livelihood?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pharmtech.com/2010/10/18/could-lawsuits-threaten-vaccine-makers%E2%80%99-livelihood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pharmtech.com/2010/10/18/could-lawsuits-threaten-vaccine-makers%e2%80%99-livelihood/</link>
	<description>The blog of Pharmaceutical Technology magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 23:30:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darren McKinney</title>
		<link>http://blog.pharmtech.com/2010/10/18/could-lawsuits-threaten-vaccine-makers%e2%80%99-livelihood/comment-page-1/#comment-33011</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren McKinney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pharmtech.com/?p=3473#comment-33011</guid>
		<description>Sara Smithers essentially asks: &quot;Why are [vaccine makers] protected by the government&quot; from speculative lawsuits when other &quot;manufacturers of consumer products&quot; are not?

The answer should be obvious.  First, childhood vaccines hardly qualify as &quot;consumer products.&quot;  And second, if government doesn&#039;t protect vaccine makers from potentially bankrupting lawsuits, driven as they are by opportunistic personal injury lawyers who manipulate their emotionally distraught clients and well-intentioned juries, such lawsuits and the resulting verdicts could quickly convince vaccine makers to quit that product line altogether.

If that were to happen, Ms. Smithers&#039; and all Americans&#039; worst fears about children&#039;s health might quickly be realized.

Darren McKinney
American Tort Reform Association
Washington, D.C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sara Smithers essentially asks: &#8220;Why are [vaccine makers] protected by the government&#8221; from speculative lawsuits when other &#8220;manufacturers of consumer products&#8221; are not?</p>
<p>The answer should be obvious.  First, childhood vaccines hardly qualify as &#8220;consumer products.&#8221;  And second, if government doesn&#8217;t protect vaccine makers from potentially bankrupting lawsuits, driven as they are by opportunistic personal injury lawyers who manipulate their emotionally distraught clients and well-intentioned juries, such lawsuits and the resulting verdicts could quickly convince vaccine makers to quit that product line altogether.</p>
<p>If that were to happen, Ms. Smithers&#8217; and all Americans&#8217; worst fears about children&#8217;s health might quickly be realized.</p>
<p>Darren McKinney<br />
American Tort Reform Association<br />
Washington, D.C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara Smithers</title>
		<link>http://blog.pharmtech.com/2010/10/18/could-lawsuits-threaten-vaccine-makers%e2%80%99-livelihood/comment-page-1/#comment-32976</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara Smithers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pharmtech.com/?p=3473#comment-32976</guid>
		<description>The right to sue a corporation for damages from a product should not be granted to all others except for drug companies? Why are they protected by the government when the Toyota corporation was not? Are not all manufacturers of consumer products legally liable for their very imperfect products especially those injected into children?  If only one child is damaged, the drug company is responsible for compensating these families for the high costs of a life time of care.  Why protect corporate profits at the risk of human health of children? Yes. Let&#039;s watch the SCOTUS overturn states rights to sue for damages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The right to sue a corporation for damages from a product should not be granted to all others except for drug companies? Why are they protected by the government when the Toyota corporation was not? Are not all manufacturers of consumer products legally liable for their very imperfect products especially those injected into children?  If only one child is damaged, the drug company is responsible for compensating these families for the high costs of a life time of care.  Why protect corporate profits at the risk of human health of children? Yes. Let&#8217;s watch the SCOTUS overturn states rights to sue for damages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
