<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Novartis Fined For Gender Discrimination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pharmtech.com/2010/05/20/novartis-fined-for-gender-discrimination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pharmtech.com/2010/05/20/novartis-fined-for-gender-discrimination/</link>
	<description>The blog of Pharmaceutical Technology magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 23:30:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://blog.pharmtech.com/2010/05/20/novartis-fined-for-gender-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-30298</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pharmtech.com/?p=2868#comment-30298</guid>
		<description>Interesting lawsuit.  I think such a suit could be brought against most of the Fortune 100 companies I have worked for.  On the other hand, I&#039;m not a big believer in the law under which it was brought.  It may have made sense in 1964, but in 2010 I believe there is more injustice involved in governmental intrusion into the conduct of private business than there is in the business conduct itself.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting lawsuit.  I think such a suit could be brought against most of the Fortune 100 companies I have worked for.  On the other hand, I&#8217;m not a big believer in the law under which it was brought.  It may have made sense in 1964, but in 2010 I believe there is more injustice involved in governmental intrusion into the conduct of private business than there is in the business conduct itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeRoy P Hawkins</title>
		<link>http://blog.pharmtech.com/2010/05/20/novartis-fined-for-gender-discrimination/comment-page-1/#comment-30220</link>
		<dc:creator>LeRoy P Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 10:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pharmtech.com/?p=2868#comment-30220</guid>
		<description>Gentlemen:  It is a simple matter through records checked to determine the discrimination  cited are valid.  It has long been known that the two genders have been paid separate amounts in salaries.
Simply correct the matter and pay what is fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentlemen:  It is a simple matter through records checked to determine the discrimination  cited are valid.  It has long been known that the two genders have been paid separate amounts in salaries.<br />
Simply correct the matter and pay what is fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
